The Delhi High Court has rejected the bail plea of Manish Sisodia in the liquor scam case. During the hearing, the court made significant remarks highlighting the use of new techniques in committing corruption and its impact on society.
Court's Observation on New Methods of Corruption :
The High Court stated that the absence of cash recovery does not imply that corruption did not occur. The court noted that nowadays, new techniques are being used to commit crimes. This comment was made during the hearing of Manish Sisodia's bail plea.
Serious Allegations of Money Laundering :
The court stated that in money laundering cases, the recovery of cash is not necessary, especially when the conspiracy involves multiple people. The court acknowledged that the liquor scam involves serious allegations of corruption and money laundering, which affect the country's socio-economic structure and reduce public trust in government institutions.
Court's Criticism of Delhi's Liquor Policy :
The High Court criticized Delhi's liquor policy, stating that it excluded small and medium shopkeepers from sales, empowering those with money and influence who then formed a cartel. The court noted that the policy was designed for financial gain, which increases the severity of the crime.
Court's Remarks on Sisodia's Conduct :
The court described Manish Sisodia's conduct as a betrayal of democratic principles. The court stated that Sisodia tried to portray Delhi's liquor policy as beneficial for everyone, while in reality, it was designed to benefit a few. The court also noted that Sisodia destroyed two phones and important evidence.
Bail Plea Rejected
The High Court denied Manish Sisodia's bail plea, stating that he had not established why he should be granted bail. Sisodia has been continuously filing bail pleas in different courts but has not received any relief.
Background of the Case :
Former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia was arrested in February 2023 in connection with the Delhi liquor scam. He was the Delhi Excise Minister, under whose jurisdiction the liquor policy was formulated, which has been alleged to have irregularities. Agencies have accused that the new policy benefited large liquor dealers and that the money received from them was used by the Aam Aadmi Party in the Goa elections.
This entire incident has once again highlighted issues of corruption and transparency in Delhi's politics and administrative system. The court's remarks and decisions have added to the gravity of the case, drawing everyone's attention to the forthcoming legal proceedings.
Thanks For Your Comment